Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Post-argument filing in Goudy-Bachman

On July 21, the District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (Judge Christopher C. Conner) heard argument on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment in Goudy-Bachman v. HHS. The sole claim at issue is whether the minimum essential coverage provision exceeds Congress's enumerated powers.

Yesterday, the plaintiffs filed one last brief for the summary judgment stage: their "Reply to Defedants' Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment." You can access that brief here.